As the aftermath of the 2020 election unfolded, marked by a series of irregularities magnified by the challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, public trust in the electoral process came under intense scrutiny. The divergence between media assertions of election security and the prevailing skepticism among segments of the population underscores the pressing need to address irregularities and reinforce the foundation of election integrity. Let us investigate the discrepancies that led to a lack of confidence in election results and advocate for measures like the SAVE Act to safeguard the sanctity of the democratic process.
Navigating Irregularities in the 2020 Election Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
The 2020 election presented a unique set of challenges exacerbated by the global COVID-19 crisis, introducing unprecedented disruptions to the electoral landscape. Irregularities ranging from changes in voting procedures to mail-in ballot expansions, to use or drop boxes were implemented in response to the pandemic, raising concerns about the integrity and transparency of the electoral process. The effects of these irregularities reverberated across the nation, prompting a reevaluation of election protocols and the need for enhanced measures to uphold the sanctity of the notion of free and fair elections.
Effect on Election Integrity and Public Confidence
The irregularities witnessed during the 2020 election cast a spotlight on the vulnerability of election systems to external factors and unforeseen circumstances. The proliferation of mail-in voting, extended deadlines, and modified procedures introduced uncertainties that tested the resilience of the electoral infrastructure and the trust of the American public in the integrity of election outcomes. These irregularities, compounded by the unprecedented challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, had far-reaching consequences, eroding public confidence and fueling skepticism towards the integrity of the electoral process. Addressing these irregularities is essential to restoring public confidence in the electoral process and reaffirming the principles of fairness, accuracy, and transparency in future elections.
Challenges to Trust in Election Results
Despite assertions of election security by media outlets and electoral authorities, a significant segment of the populace remains hesitant to fully trust the outcomes of the 2020 election. The discord between official narratives of a secure election and the persistent doubts harbored by many Americans stems from a combination of factors, including the prevalence of irregularities, perceived lack of transparency in election administration, and concerns over the potential influence of external actors on electoral integrity.
Media Narratives and Public Perception
The divergence between media assurances of election security and public skepticism reveals a disconnect between official narratives and grassroots sentiments regarding the trustworthiness of election results. While media coverage often emphasizes the absence of widespread fraud and the overall integrity of the electoral process, lingering questions surrounding irregularities and discrepancies persist, underscoring the essential need for transparency, accountability, and thorough investigation to address public concerns and restore faith in the electoral system.
Marc Elias: An Influential Figure in Election Law and Procedures
Marc Elias has emerged as a prominent and influential figure in the realm of election law, notably involved in legal challenges aimed at reshaping election procedures and practices. Elias's efforts to alter election protocols through litigation, bypassing state legislatures, have raised significant concerns about the propriety and legality of such actions. By advocating against the necessity for voters to prove citizenship and instead relying on the honor system for voting, Elias's approach has drawn criticism for potentially undermining the integrity of the electoral process and disenfranchising lawful voters. These actions have ignited debates about the fundamental principles of democratic governance, election accountability, and the challenges posed by altering voting requirements outside the bounds of legislative oversight. Engaging with these complex and consequential issues underscores the critical importance of upholding the integrity of the electoral system, protecting the rights of legal voters, and ensuring that election procedures are transparent, secure, and reflective of democratic principles.
Advocating for Transparency, Accountability, and Electoral Reforms
In response to the election irregularities that unfolded during the 2020 election, the conservative perspective emphasizes the critical importance of transparency, accountability, and electoral reforms to address vulnerabilities and strengthen the electoral process. Calls for comprehensive audits, investigations into irregularities, and the implementation of protocols that enhance verification, oversight, and security in future elections remain paramount in upholding democratic values, restoring public trust, and preserving the integrity of the electoral system.
The SAVE Act Introduced by House Republicans, seeks to mandate proof of U.S. citizenship for all federal elections in an effort to prevent noncitizens from voting. The SAVE Act legislation is poised to reassure Americans that their voices are being heard and provide a significant sense of relief for conservatives concerned about the potential for undocumented individuals to influence the voting process.
Under the current National Voter Registration Act, individuals attest to their citizenship by checking a box on registration forms. However, the SAVE Act proposes significant changes, requiring prospective voters to furnish documentation proving their citizenship. Accepted forms of proof include a U.S. passport, a photo ID card issued with proof of citizenship, or a combination of a photo ID and supporting documents like a birth certificate or US naturalization papers.
The Pushback
The SAVE Act, aimed at reinforcing citizenship requirements for voting and enhancing election integrity, is facing notable resistance from Democrats and President Biden. This opposition stems from differing perspectives on voter access, concerns over potential disenfranchisement, and interpretations of the legislation's impact on electoral processes. Democrats and President Biden argue that the SAVE Act could impose barriers to voting for marginalized communities, restrict access to the polls, and potentially infringe upon voting rights. They contend that stringent citizenship verification measures could disproportionately impact certain demographics and hinder the inclusivity of the electoral system. The pushback against the SAVE Act reflects broader debates within the political landscape surrounding voting rights, election procedures, and the balance between security measures and voting accessibility.
Conservatives are advocating for measures to prevent the disenfranchisement of legitimate voters amidst concerns over the substantial influx of approximately ten million individuals who have illegally crossed the border since President Biden took office. The focus is on ensuring that these individuals, who entered the country unlawfully, do not compromise the integrity of the voting process or dilute the impact of lawful votes cast by American citizens. This emphasis on safeguarding the electoral system and upholding the rights of legal voters underscores the importance of addressing the challenges posed by illegal immigration and its potential implications for the democratic process.
Elon Musk who obtained his US citizenship in 2002 went so far as to claim those who do not support the SAVE Act, could be traitors.
Must went on to repost a comment that signifies what happens with voter fraud
Former President Trump issued the following statement from his account on Truth Social
Preserving the sanctity of the electoral process and safeguarding the rights of legal voters remains paramount amid the challenges posed by illegal immigration and concerns over potential disenfranchisement. By advocating for measures to uphold election integrity, conservatives aim to address the complexities of voter participation, ensure transparency in democratic practices, and reinforce the fundamental principles of fair and lawful voting in the United States.
We would love to hear your opinion on the SAVE Act. Feel free to comment on our article.
Comments