The controversy surrounding the Philadelphia Eagles and their bus stop posters emerged when advertisements appeared across Philadelphia, depicting Vice President Kamala Harris wearing an Eagles helmet and proclaiming her as the "official candidate of the Philadelphia Eagles." These posters, strategically placed at various bus stops, including one on Penn’s campus, quickly spread across social media, causing significant confusion and backlash.
The Eagles promptly responded by denying any involvement in the creation of these ads, stating that they were counterfeit and not authorized by the team. The ads also directed people to the official Eagles voting outreach program website, adding to the confusion.
News outlets are reporting the ads are fake, however, a deeper dive into the Philadelphia Eagles gives a different impression. To begin with, the website PhiladelphiaEagles.com/vote is actively engaging people to participate in the voting process similar to voting efforts conducted by renowned Democrats like Mark Zuckerberg.
Secondly, but more troubling is @ChristianMolnar who claims to be the Sports sales & marketing pro with 25 years of experience with the Philadelphia Eagles, AEG, NIKE, and Penn State Football. By his own X account which has recently been deleted but caught by @LauraLoomer his statement that it was vandalism to cover the photos of Kamala Harris.
Contrary to what might be expected, the Eagles did not support the removal or covering up of these fake ads. Instead, they considered the act of covering the ads as vandalism. This stance surprised some, as it indicated that the team was more concerned with the unauthorized modification of public spaces than with the misleading nature of the ads themselves.
Marketing Department’s Influence: The Eagles' marketing department, led by individuals who have shown partisan leanings, particularly against former President Donald Trump, has been criticized for potentially influencing the team's public stance. The department’s response to the controversy, particularly their view that covering up the ads constituted vandalism, suggests a reluctance to fully distance the team from the political implications of the posters.
The Philadelphia Eagles are claiming they are trying to have the ads removed. "We are aware counterfeit political ads are being circulated and are working with our advertising partner to have them removed."
However, there are questions that need to be addressed. Why are the Eagles so engaged in the voting process while allowing these posters to be placed in strategic areas around the city?
Perception of Political Bias: Despite any official retraction or denial, the combination of these elements—the voter registration initiative, the Harris posters, and the marketing department’s actions—has led to a perception that the Eagles favor one political candidate over another. This perception is difficult to shake, especially in a highly polarized political environment.
The controversy surrounding the Philadelphia Eagles reflects the challenges organizations face in maintaining political neutrality, particularly when their actions—or perceived actions—suggest otherwise. Whether intentional or not, the combination of their voter registration efforts, the unauthorized Harris posters, and the partisan actions of their marketing department has fueled the debate over the team’s political leanings. This situation highlights the fine line organizations must walk in navigating civic engagement without alienating parts of their fanbase.
Was it a mistake or a miscalculation on behalf of the Philadelphia Eagles, or are they trying to cover their hind ends to prevent a boycott?
We want to know what you think.
Comments